Back to blog
Shareholder conflicts: how mediation can protect the company (and the relationship)
Two signatures on the articles of incorporation, years of working side by side — and one day, deadlock: different visions about money, about the company's direction, about how much each partner works. Conflicts between business partners are among the most destructive commercial disputes, because the poison does not stay in the boardroom: it flows straight into the company's operations, into postponed decisions and into the confidence of everyone around.
The good news: many of these conflicts can be resolved without going to court. In this article we show you what mediation of conflicts between business partners and shareholders can achieve, how the procedure actually unfolds and which signals tell you it is time to act.
Why court is the last place you want to end up
Corporate litigation — excluding a partner, withdrawal, dissolution, annulment of shareholder resolutions — has a duration that is hard to anticipate, depending on the court, the complexity of the case and the appeals lodged. While the case is pending, the company lives in uncertainty: the bank sees the lawsuit, partners hesitate to sign new contracts, key employees start looking elsewhere. And the file is public: your competitors can read everything that divides you.
A lawsuit resolves at most the legal question. The real cause of the conflict — trust, contribution, unspoken expectations — remains untouched.
Placed side by side with litigation, mediation looks like this:
| Criterion | Corporate litigation | Mediation |
|---|---|---|
| Duration | Hard to anticipate — depends on the court, the complexity of the case and the appeals lodged | Timetable set by the parties, depending on the complexity of the situation and their availability |
| Publicity | Public court file — visible to competitors, banks, partners | Confidential, under the conditions of the law |
| Who decides the outcome | The court | The parties, within the limits of the law |
| The relationship between partners | Subjected to an adversarial procedure, which can deepen tensions | Can be repaired or ended in a civilised way |
| The company in the meantime | Uncertainty, departures, frozen decisions | Keeps running, with a clear plan |
Deadlock scenarios we mediate frequently
Every company has its own story, but the patterns repeat themselves. These are the situations we encounter most often:
- Decision deadlock at 50/50 — two equal partners, two visions, no resolution possible. Negotiated solutions: new governance rules, an arbiter for veto situations, different decision thresholds for different categories of resolutions.
- The managing partner versus the investing partner — one wants to reinvest the profit, the other wants dividends. The classic source of tension, which can be defused through a dividend policy agreed several years in advance.
- Amicable separation — one partner exits the company, with a negotiated price and payment schedule, without dissolution and without an exclusion lawsuit.
- Unclear roles — who runs operations, who controls, how and how often reporting happens. The conflict feels personal, but it is often just a problem of decision architecture.
- Unequal workload — one partner carries everything, the other has gradually stepped back from operations, and the paperwork and percentages no longer reflect reality.
- Heirs and withdrawn partners — disagreements with the heirs of a deceased partner or with former partners over the rights left behind.
Confidentiality and the parties' control over the timetable
How long a corporate mediation takes depends on the complexity of the situation, the number of parties and their availability — the timetable is set by the parties together with the mediator, not by an outside deadline. Just as important: the discussions stay between the parties, under the conditions of the law, from the first phone call to the last signature.
Key takeaway
Mediation is confidential under the conditions of the law: under Law no. 192/2006, the mediator is bound by an obligation of confidentiality, and the sessions are not public. Statements and proposals made during the procedure cannot be used as evidence in judicial or arbitral proceedings, subject to the exceptions provided by law or agreed by the parties (Article 53). For a company mindful of its reputation, this discretion can weigh heavily in the choice of procedure. We have covered the confidentiality guarantees of mediation in a separate article.
What the process looks like, step by step
- The information session — free of charge. We explain how mediation works in your specific situation and what the procedure involves, with no obligation.
- The mediation preparation contract. If you decide to move forward, we sign the pre-mediation contract and receive the relevant documents: articles of incorporation, shareholder resolutions, financial statements, the correspondence between partners.
- Studying and assessing the case. We analyse the documents and the structure of the conflict. Only after this stage do we communicate the mediation fee — usually within at least one business day, depending on complexity.
- Inviting the other party. We invite the other partner (or partners) to mediation. If they refuse, we close the procedure with a report of termination — and you know exactly where you stand and can decide your next step with full knowledge of the situation.
- The mediation contract and the procedure itself. We almost always start with separate sessions: each partner tells us, confidentially, how they see things and what they actually want — not the official position, but the real interest. Then, in joint sessions, we turn positions ("I want him out") into negotiable options ("I want operational control" / "I want liquidity").
What force the final agreement has
The agreement is drafted together with the parties' lawyers and can cover everything that matters: the price and payment schedule for the shares, new governance rules, how internal and external communication is handled. Under Article 58 of Law no. 192/2006 (including paragraph 2^1, introduced by Law no. 154/2019), the agreement may acquire enforceable character through notarial authentication, through its confirmation by the court in a consent judgment, or through the verification and attestation of the agreement by the parties' lawyers or by a notary public, under the conditions of the law. For acts concerning the transfer of ownership or other real rights over immovable property, partitions and succession cases, the law requires specific mandatory formalities. Where needed, the agreement is translated into shareholder resolutions and Trade Registry filings. We have explained in detail the legal force of the mediation agreement.
The signals that it is time to act
If partner meetings have become monologues, if decisions have been postponed for months, if emails have replaced conversations — do not wait for the court summons. The earlier a conflict is mediated, the more options stay on the table, including the one where you continue together.
And if the tension has not yet turned into a legal dispute — there is only friction, exhausting meetings, decisions that keep stalling — a facilitated conversation inside the company can prevent escalation, before a formal mediation is even needed.
Legal sources: Romanian Law no. 192/2006 on mediation and the organisation of the mediator profession, consolidated form consulted on 14 July 2026. Last legal review of this article: 14 July 2026.
Read more: Shareholder disputes →
